Victor Wong

Make a difference in people's life

Five myths about green energy By Robert Bryce

Listen with webreader

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/04/23/AR2010042302220.html

washingtonpost.com

ad_icon

Five myths about green energy
By Robert Bryce
Sunday, April 25, 2010; B04

Americans are being inundated with claims about renewable and alternative energy. Advocates for these technologies say that if we jettison fossil fuels, we’ll breathe easier, stop global warming and revolutionize our economy. Yes, “green” energy has great emotional and political appeal. But before we wrap all our hopes — and subsidies — in it, let’s take a hard look at some common misconceptions about what “green” means.

1. Solar and wind power are the greenest of them all.
Unfortunately, solar and wind technologies require huge amounts of land to deliver relatively small amounts of energy, disrupting natural habitats. Even an aging natural gas well producing 60,000 cubic feet per day generates more than 20 times the watts per square meter of a wind turbine. A nuclear power plant cranks out about 56 watts per square meter, eight times as much as is derived from solar photovoltaic installations. The real estate that wind and solar energy demand led the Nature Conservancy to issue a report last year critical of “energy sprawl,” including tens of thousands of miles of high-voltage transmission lines needed to carry electricity from wind and solar installations to distant cities.

Nor does wind energy substantially reduce CO2 emissions. Since the wind doesn’t always blow, utilities must use gas- or coal-fired generators to offset wind’s unreliability. The result is minimal — or no — carbon dioxide reduction.

Denmark, the poster child for wind energy boosters, more than doubled its production of wind energy between 1999 and 2007. Yet data from Energinet.dk, the operator of Denmark’s natural gas and electricity grids, show that carbon dioxide emissions from electricity generation in 2007 were at about the same level as they were back in 1990, before the country began its frenzied construction of turbines. Denmark has done a good job of keeping its overall carbon dioxide emissions flat, but that is in large part because of near-zero population growth and exorbitant energy taxes, not wind energy. And through 2017, the Danes foresee no decrease in carbon dioxide emissions from electricity generation.

2. Going green will reduce our dependence on imports from unsavory regimes.
In the new green economy, batteries are not included. Neither are many of the “rare earth” elements that are essential ingredients in most alternative energy technologies. Instead of relying on the diversity of the global oil market — about 20 countries each produce at least 1 million barrels of crude per day — the United States will be increasingly reliant on just one supplier, China, for elements known as lanthanides. Lanthanum, neodymium, dysprosium and other rare earth elements are used in products from high-capacity batteries and hybrid-electric vehicles to wind turbines and oil refinery catalysts.

China controls between 95 and 100 percent of the global market in these elements. And the Chinese government is reducing its exports of lanthanides to ensure an adequate supply for its domestic manufacturers. Politicians love to demonize oil-exporting countries such as Saudi Arabia and Iran, but adopting the technologies needed to drastically cut U.S. oil consumption will dramatically increase America’s dependence on China.

3. A green American economy will create green American jobs.
In a global market, American wind turbine manufacturers face the same problem as American shoe manufacturers: high domestic labor costs. If U.S. companies want to make turbines, they will have to compete with China, which not only controls the market for neodymium, a critical ingredient in turbine magnets, but has access to very cheap employees.

The Chinese have also signaled their willingness to lose money on solar panels in order to gain market share. China’s share of the world’s solar module business has grown from about 7 percent in 2005 to about 25 percent in 2009.

Meanwhile, the very concept of a green job is not well defined. Is a job still green if it’s created not by the market, but by subsidy or mandate? Consider the claims being made by the subsidy-dependent corn ethanol industry. Growth Energy, an industry lobby group, says increasing the percentage of ethanol blended into the U.S. gasoline supply would create 136,000 jobs. But an analysis by the Environmental Working Group found that no more than 27,000 jobs would be created, and each one could cost taxpayers as much as $446,000 per year. Sure, the government can create more green jobs. But at what cost?

4. Electric cars will substantially reduce demand for oil.
Nissan and Tesla are just two of the manufacturers that are increasing production of all-electric cars. But in the electric car’s century-long history, failure tailgates failure. In 1911, the New York Times declared that the electric car “has long been recognized as the ideal” because it “is cleaner and quieter” and “much more economical” than its gasoline-fueled cousins. But the same unreliability of electric car batteries that flummoxed Thomas Edison persists today.

Those who believe that Detroit unplugged the electric car are mistaken. Electric cars haven’t been sidelined by a cabal to sell internal combustion engines or a lack of political will, but by physics and math. Gasoline contains about 80 times as much energy, by weight, as the best lithium-ion battery. Sure, the electric motor is more efficient than the internal combustion engine, but can we depend on batteries that are notoriously finicky, short-lived and take hours to recharge? Speaking of recharging, last June, the Government Accountability Office reported that about 40 percent of consumers do not have access to an outlet near their vehicle at home. The electric car is the next big thing — and it always will be.

5. The United States lags behind other rich countries in going green.
Over the past three decades, the United States has improved its energy efficiency as much as or more than other developed countries. According to data from the Energy Information Administration, average per capita energy consumption in the United States fell by 2.5 percent from 1980 through 2006. That reduction was greater than in any other developed country except Switzerland and Denmark, and the United States achieved it without participating in the Kyoto Protocol or creating an emissions trading system like the one employed in Europe. EIA data also show that the United States has been among the best at reducing the amount of carbon dioxide emitted per $1 of GDP and the amount of energy consumed per $1 of GDP.

America’s move toward a more service-based economy that is less dependent on heavy industry and manufacturing is driving this improvement. In addition, the proliferation of computer chips in everything from automobiles to programmable thermostats is wringing more useful work out of each unit of energy consumed. The United States will continue going green by simply allowing engineers and entrepreneurs to do what they do best: make products that are faster, cheaper and more efficient than the ones they made the year before.

Robert Bryce is a senior fellow at the Manhattan Institute. His fourth book, “Power Hungry: The Myths of ‘Green’ Energy and the Real Fuels of the Future,” will be out Tuesday, April 27.

Want to challenge everything you think you know? Visit the “Five Myths” archive.

“); COMMENTS_ACTIVE = true ; } else { document.write(‘View all comments that have been posted about this article.

‘); } } else { document.write(”); } // –>

1 comment

CNBC – Risk of 30-40% Drop in Stocks: Strategist

Listen with webreader

http://victorwong.1simplechoice.com
http://www.cnbc.com/id/36550873
Current DateTime: 12:33:24 16 Apr 2010
LinksList Documentid: 25124396
Expiration DateTime: 4/16/2010 12:36:56 AM

MOST SHARED

Current DateTime: 12:36:51 16 Apr 2010
LinksList Documentid: 31330905
Expiration DateTime: 4/16/2010 12:39:45 AM
Current DateTime: 12:36:40 16 Apr 2010
LinksList Documentid: 23452000
Expiration DateTime: 4/16/2010 12:39:40 AM
Current DateTime: 12:36:38 16 Apr 2010
LinksList Documentid: 23452764
Expiration DateTime: 4/16/2010 12:39:24 AM

RSS FEED

» Help
Current DateTime: 10:18:56 15 Apr 2010
LinksList Documentid: 30328029

Risk of 30-40% Drop in Stocks: Strategist

Published: Thursday, 15 Apr 2010 | 9:58 AM ET
Text Size
By: Lisa Auret
Assistant Web Producer, CNBC

The market is in a Goldilocks rally — conditions not too hot or cold — but the bears will come out in the medium term, Kirby Daley, strategist at Newedge Group told CNBC Thursday.

Wall Street Trader

The exiting of stimulus packages, sovereign debt problems and China’s revaluation of the yuan, are all working against a continuation of the rally, Daley said.

“We’re in a sweet spot right now. We will not be in one six to twelve months from now,” Daley said. “I don’t believe we have 30 percent upside from here, I certainly believe we are at risk of 30 to 40 percent downside from here.”

“Every economic statistic that we’re seeing now in the world … has been bought,” Daley added. “The difference in the past is when we buy the economic statistics this time, we’re buying them largely on credit and that credit has to be paid back. It’s not leading to a self-sustaining cycle of recovery which is key.”

“Right now we’re enjoying the confluence of the implementation of massive stimulus, massive monetary stimulus as well as fiscal, around the world,” he added. “We’re enjoying it right now. But when we have to pay the piper, starting next year in the US … and around the rest of the world as the debt problems continue to come out, that will weigh on growth, that will weigh on earnings and markets will adjust.”

Need to Pay Off Debt

The U.S. has taken on “this massive public sector debt” and has “only deleveraged very slightly on private sector debt, Daley told CNBC.

“We have to work through the debt,” he said. “So the debt that we’ve taken on in the public side has to be paid back. That has to be paid back through higher taxes, through cutting of services. That will affect the bottom lines of these companies.”

Companies have enjoyed the fruits of massive implementation of stimulus, Daley said. He acknowledged that companies have made tremendous cuts, that productivity is high and that a lot of companies’ balance sheets “are flush around the world.”

But companies will not have the energy to feed that in terms of the consumption that they were used to in 2009 and early 2010 because “we can not afford to implement this kind of stimulus again for 2011. And that’s when the brakes are going to start to come on,” he said.

Strong Yuan Could Curb China’s Export Demand

China’s fast and strong growth is not sustainable, Daley said. Appreciation of the yuan “is not the best economic solution to do,” he added.

“Rising yuan will not arrest the inflation problem completely. We need to look for more tightening from China in the way of interest rate hikes, reserve requirements, and other policy tools,” he said.

Daley predicts that yuan strengthening could possibly slow China’s export demand, especially next year.

“That’s why China is very, very latent to put in any type of revaluation,” he said. “This is not only going to affect China, but Japan and other countries around Asia.”

© 2010 CNBC.com
VN:F [1.8.3_1051]
Rating: 10.0/10 (1 vote cast)
VN:F [1.8.3_1051]
Rating: +1 (from 1 vote)

1 comment

Coming Soon: Take Photo Of Check, Deposit It in Bank

Listen with webreader



http://www.cnbc.com/id/35911747/
Published: Thursday, 18 Mar 2010 | 12:27 PM ET

By: Joseph Pisani
CNBC News Associate

Picture this: Soon, consumers will be depositing paper checks straight into their bank account by taking a couple of photos with a smartphone.

The technology is already available at USAA, an insurance company and bank that primarily serves military personnel and their families. Larger banks such as Chase and Citi intend to add the technology—known as remote-deposit capture—later this year.

Mobile Check Deposit
Source: J&B Software
A user takes a photo of their check on an iPhone.

Banks have already offered smartphone applications that let customers check balances, transfer funds and make payments. This new addition would take mobile banking a step further.

“The smartphone really becomes a mini ATM in your pocket,” said Bhavik Patel, product principal for remote capture for J&B Software, a company that has developed technology to do mobile remote deposits for banks, brokerages and other institutions.

Here’s how it works: A bank customer takes a photo of the front of the check and the back of the check that has been signed by the customer. The photo gets sent to the bank through its mobile application. In most cases, funds are in the customers account immediately.

Tom Kelly, a spokesperson at Chase [JPM  43.45  -0.19  (-0.44%)   ] said the company would offer the service to consumers at the end of this year. Sources say that Citi [C  3.90  -0.12  (-2.99%)   ] is planning a limited roll out of the technology later this year, as well as a way for customers to scan paper checks from their home scanners an deposit them through the bank’s website. A Bank of America [BAC  16.82  -0.26  (-1.52%)   ] spokesperson said the company “continues to evaluate new mobile technology.”

According to an August 2009 survey of 174 banks conducted by financial services research firm Celent, 28 percent said that they are at least considered offering a mobile remote deposit solution, while over half of the banks said they were considering remote deposits for consumers through a desktop scanner.

Scanners have already been sold by banks to business customers who then deposit a large amount of checks deposited without entering a bank branch. Experts say that most businesses are using scanners to make check deposits, a practice that began in 2004 after the Check Clearing for the 21st Century Act was enacted, allowing checks to be cleared and settled through images.

In the case of smartphone deposits, USAA had some $400 million deposited through smartphones since the service launched in August 2009, according to Jeff Dennes, executive director of mobile services at USAA. As of today, 12 percent of all deposits are coming from smartphones, said Dennes. The technology, so far, is available on Apple’s [AAPL  222.2499  -2.4001  (-1.07%)   ] iPhone and smartphones that use Google’s [GOOG  560.00  -6.40  (-1.13%)   ] Android operating system. The inhouse development team is working on getting the mobile deposits on Research In Motion’s [RIMM  73.0575  -1.4125  (-1.9%)   ] BlackBerry devices.

While USAA has seen success with the technology, it remains to be seen if American consumers will rush to use it. Part of why it has taken off at USAA is because the bank has no branches, making it even more essential to be able to deposit a paper check at any time.

Photo: USAA
USAA has been offering the service since August 2009, and has received some $400 million in deposits this way.

Research seems to show that the technology is something consumers want. A recent survey found that 22 percent of those with mobile phones were likely to use mobile remote deposit, according to financial services consulting and investment firm Mercatus LLC. As for those already using mobile banking on their phone, 59 percent were likely to also deposit paper checks through their phone.

As with any new financial services technology, security is always a hurdle with consumers. “Internet and mobile banking tends to be hampered by security concerns by a proportion of the population,” said Bob Meara, a senior analyst at Celent. He added that for the many who use online and mobile banking already, “they’re quite convinced its safe,” said Meara.

“Those concerns are easily overcome,” adds Mike Friedman, a senior analyst at Mercatus LLC. “The functionality will far out weigh the security concerns.”

Those offering the technology say that their products are secure. J&B Software’s technology encrypts the image when it’s sent from the smartphone so that it’s unreadable, said Patel. The image is also not saved on the smartphone, in case the device is lost.

More banks are expected to add the feature, especially as consumers demand 24 hour banking. “They’re time shifting to pay their bills on the bus ride instead of at home,” said Friedman.

“The banks that deploy this are going to attract more consumers than banks that don’t deploy this,” he added.

© 2010 CNBC.com
VN:F [1.8.3_1051]
Rating: 10.0/10 (1 vote cast)
VN:F [1.8.3_1051]
Rating: +1 (from 1 vote)

2 comments

Connectors Keep It Simple By Dr. John C. Maxwell

Listen with webreader


http://victorwong.1simplechoice.com
Simplicity is Power…

http://www.giantimpact.com/articles/read/connectors_keep_it_simple/

William Henry Harrison gave the longest inaugural address of any U.S. President, taking two hours to plod through a whopping 8,445-word speech. Even though the speech was delivered outdoors on a frigid and rainy day, the President stubbornly refused to wear an overcoat or hat. As a result, he caught a cold that developed into pneumonia, and he died a month later. The leadership lesson: it pays to simplify.

Two Myths about Simplicity

Myth #1 Simplicity Lacks Depth

A few years ago, I was being interviewed on a television talk show. “John,” the host said, “I’ve read several of your books, and they are all so simple.” His mocking tone made it clear to the audience and to me that the comment was not intended as a compliment.

My response was direct: “That’s true. The principles in my books are simple to understand, but they are not always simple to apply.” The audience applauded, and the talk show host conceded that what I said was true.

We often associate simplicity with a lack of depth or shortage of intelligence. Conversely, we ascribe intelligence to people who communicate using big words or hard-to-grasp concepts. Somehow, we assume that anyone speaking in a dense, academic style must be smart.

The issues we face in life can be complex, with all sorts of intricacies. However, as leaders and communicators, our job is to bring clarity to a subject, reducing rather than adding to its complexity. The measure of a great teacher isn’t what he knows; it’s what his students know. Simplicity is a skill, and it’s a necessary one if you want to connect with people when you communicate.

Myth #2 Simplicity Is Easy

When we encounter something simple, we assume it has been hastily thrown together or not fully thought out. To us, simplicity means taking shortcuts and denying the complex reality of life. However, in a society flooded with information, simplicity has never been more difficult to achieve. Nor has it ever been as important.

Perhaps nobody understands simplicity better than Apple, Inc. The company put its computers back on the map by touting their user-friendly interfaces. Then, Apple leapfrogged the competition by pioneering devices that simplified the way we access, store, and share information.

Despite his success in bringing about simplicity, Apple CEO Steve Jobs attests to the difficulty of doing so.

If you read the Apple’s first brochure, the headline was “Simplicity is the Ultimate Sophistication.” What we meant by that was that when you first attack a problem it seems really simple because you don’t understand it. Then when you start to really understand it, you come up with these very complicated solutions because it’s really hairy. Most people stop there. But a few people keep burning the midnight oil and finally understand the underlying principles of the problem and come up with an elegantly simple solution for it. But very few people go the distance to get there.

A leader’s initial attempts to resolve a problem raise a host of questions that make the problem appear bigger than it did at first. However, as leaders persevere through the haze of complexity and wade through the maze of possible remedies, they often arrive at a simple solution. Once they have the solution, and can state it plainly, leaders are in position to connect with their customers.

Summary

It may seem counterintuitive, but if you want to take your communication to the next level, don’t try to dazzle people with your intellect or overpower them with information. Give them clarity and simplicity. People will relate to you, and they’ll want to invite you back to communicate with them again.

Also, don’t expect simplicity to come easily. At first, your attempts to find clarity may seem to backfire. Nevertheless, press on and maintain focus. Eventually, you’ll reduce your problems to a manageable size, and you’ll uncover simple principles that will aid your ability to connect with those you serve.
About

John C. Maxwell is an internationally respected leadership expert, speaker, and author who has sold more than 18 million books. Dr. Maxwell is the founder of EQUIP, a non-profit organization that has trained more than 5 million leaders in 126 countries worldwide. Each year he speaks to the leaders of diverse organizations, such as Fortune 500 companies, foreign governments, the National Football League, the United States Military Academy at West Point, and the United Nations. A New York Times, Wall Street Journal, and Business Week best-selling author, Maxwell has written three books that have sold more than a million copies: The 21 Irrefutable Laws of Leadership, Developing the Leader Within You, and The 21 Indispensable Qualities of a Leader. His blog can be read at www.JohnMaxwellOnLeadership.com.

VN:F [1.8.3_1051]
Rating: 10.0/10 (1 vote cast)
VN:F [1.8.3_1051]
Rating: +1 (from 1 vote)

Add a comment

Should You Be An Entrepreneur? Take This Test (Harvard Business Review)

Listen with webreader

http://victorwong.1simplechoice.com

Should You Be An Entrepreneur? Take This Test

3:10 PM Friday February 12, 2010
by Daniel Isenberg  | Comments (52)

Some of your friends are doing it. People who do it are in the front pages and web almost every day. Even President Obama is talking about it. So should you do it? Should you join the millions of people every year who take the plunge and start their first ventures? I’ve learned in my own years as an entrepreneur — and now an entrepreneurship professor — that there is a gut level “fit” for people who are potential entrepreneurs. There are strong internal drivers that compel people to create their own business. I’ve developed a 2–minute Isenberg Entrepreneur Test, below, to help you find out. Just answer yes or no. Be honest with yourself — remember from my last post: the worst lies are the ones we tell ourselves.

  1. I don’t like being told what to do by people who are less capable than I am.
  2. I like challenging myself.
  3. I like to win.
  4. I like being my own boss.
  5. I always look for new and better ways to do things.
  6. I like to question conventional wisdom.
  7. I like to get people together in order to get things done.
  8. People get excited by my ideas.
  9. I am rarely satisfied or complacent.
  10. I can’t sit still.
  11. I can usually work my way out of a difficult situation.
  12. I would rather fail at my own thing than succeed at someone else’s.
  13. Whenever there is a problem, I am ready to jump right in.
  14. I think old dogs can learn — even invent — new tricks.
  15. Members of my family run their own businesses.
  16. I have friends who run their own businesses.
  17. I worked after school and during vacations when I was growing up.
  18. I get an adrenaline rush from selling things.
  19. I am exhilarated by achieving results.
  20. I could have written a better test than Isenberg (and here is what I would change ….)

If you answered “yes” on 17 or more of these questions, look at your paycheck (if you are lucky enough to still get one). If the company that issued the check isn’t owned by you, it is time for some soul searching: Do you have debts to pay? Kids in college? Alimony? Want to take it easy? Maybe better to wait. Do you have a little extra cash in the bank and several credit cards? Do you have a spouse, partner, friends, or kids who will cheer you on? If so, start thinking about what kind of business you want to set up. It doesn’t matter what age you are: research by the Kauffman Foundation shows that more and more over–50s are setting up their own businesses. Talk to people who have made the plunge, learn how to plan and deliver a product or service, think about that small business you might buy, talk to people with whom you would like to work, and talk to customers.

“I like to take risks” is not on the list. People don’t choose to be entrepreneurs by opting for a riskier lifestyle. What they do, instead, is reframe the salary vs. entrepreneur choice as between two different sets of risk: the things they don’t like about having a steady job — such as the risk of boredom, working for a bad boss, lack of autonomy, lack of control over your fate, and getting laid off — and the things they fear about being an entrepreneur — possible failure, financial uncertainty, shame or embarrassment, and lost investment. In the end, people who are meant to be entrepreneurs believe that their own abilities (e.g. leadership, resourcefulness, pluck, hard work) or assets (e.g. money, intellectual property, information, access to customers) significantly mitigate the risks of entrepreneurship. Risk is ultimately a personal assessment: what is risky for me is not risky for you.

“I want to get rich” is not on the list either. All else being equal (and all else is rarely equal in the real world), on the average, people who set up their own businesses don’t make more money, although a few do succeed in grabbing the brass ring. But the “psychic benefits” — the challenge, autonomy, recognition, excitement, and creativity — make it all worthwhile.

Daniel Isenberg is a Professor of Management Practice, Babson College



VN:F [1.8.3_1051]
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)
VN:F [1.8.3_1051]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

3 comments

AR.Drone – iPhone Controlled Quadrocopter Unveiled at CES2010

Listen with webreader

http://www.gorobotics.net/the-news/ardrone-iphone-controlled-quadrocpter-unveiled-at-ces2009/#more-1207

ar.drone from Parrot flying

A french company, named Parrot, unveiled an iPhone controlled, wifi-enabled, quadrocopter at CES 2010.  The robot, called the AR.Drone, is a sophisticated and snazzy quadrocopter that is controlled via an iPhone or iPod Touch over a wifi connection. The AR.Drone has two onboard cameras, one of which streams live video back to the iPod screen, an ultrasonic altimeter, and a gyro/accelerometer based stabilization system. The drone also has a neat “augmented reality” system that overlays computer generated graphics and objects on the video feed, to allow users to play games or compete against each other with multiple AR.Drones. CNet says, “You’ll get about 15 minutes of battery-powered fun on a one-hour charge”, and reports that the vehicle will retail for around $500.

The most interesting part of the AR.Drone is that the wifi interface will have an API! This means that there is significant potential for building complex robotics projects using an inexpensive flying system (robot swarms, anyone?). Parrot has already created a developers website and has uploaded demo code for getting started with programming for the AR.Drone.

More images after the jump.

ar.drone from Parrot face

ar.drone from Parrot vertical camera and sensorsShare our stories!

VN:F [1.8.3_1051]
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)
VN:F [1.8.3_1051]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

Add a comment

Kill Wall Street Bonuses or Tax ‘em to Death, MIT’s Simon Johnson Says

Listen with webreader

http://finance.yahoo.com/tech-ticker/kill-wall-street-bonuses-or-tax-%27em-to-death-mit%27s-simon-johnson-says-402210.html

Posted Jan 12, 2010 07:30am EST by Aaron Task in NewsmakersBanking

Related: XLFJPMGSBACCMSWFC

Bashing big banks is all the rage this week, with White House officials and New York Attorney General Andrew Cuomo scolding Wall Street fat catsahead of the Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission, which gets underway Wednesday.At issue is what level of bonuses are appropriate for publicly traded firms that posted record profits in 2009 thanks to the government’s largess and after being rescued in 2008.

Simon Johnson, professor at MIT’s Sloan School of Management and former chief economist of the IMF, says there’s a simple solution to this seemingly complex problem: “People working at our largest banks – say over $100 billion in total assets – should get zero bonus for 2009.”

Looking back, all the big firms were saved by the various government programs, including  Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley were allowed to convert to bank holding company status in 2008, Johnson says. “There were unconditional bailouts for all our big banks – it was a decision made on the fly in the crisis. Let’s not second-guess,” he says. “But no way that strategy implies, requires, or is consistent with the banks then paying all that money out to their employees.”

By contrast, when the government instituted a similar “recapitalization” strategy for banks after the Latin America debt crisis of the early 1980s, the banks retained the money to help rebuild their balance sheets, he recalls. “In this case they’re going to pay out 40% [of profits] – that’s not good economic policy.”

And if the “too big to fail” banks insist on paying bonuses for “retention” purposes or other reasons he deems fallacious, Johnson says they should be subject to a “steeply progressive windfall income tax” — paid by the employees and not the firms, as is the case with the U.K.’s recently announced 50% bonus tax.

VN:F [1.8.3_1051]
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)
VN:F [1.8.3_1051]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

Add a comment

The Real Losers in the Tiger Woods Scandal By Nick Kapur

Listen with webreader

http://www.fool.com/investing/general/2010/01/11/the-real-losers-in-the-tiger-woods-scandal.aspx?source=ihpsitth0000001

One family has been destroyed, and millions have lost a role model. We know that these are the victims of Tiger Woods’ depraved and selfish acts, but they are not the losers. The real losers in this whole affair will be the corporate sponsors who’ve just dumped a golden goose after what amounts to just another bread-and-butter scandal.

Yes, I know. I’m a monster. I’m insensitive and callous. But let me just try to make the case that Tiger is a huge value play right now.

Let’s begin with the facts
Here’s what we know about Tiger Woods and golf:

With the possible exception of Michael Jordan, no other athlete has so dominated a major professional sport (on and off the field) as much as Tiger. Athletes of this caliber, with vast commercial appeal, are precious resources and should not be disposed of hastily. And yet this is precisely what some of Tiger’s largest sponsors have done — apparently without consideration of what it will cost them over the long term. That’s a big mistake.

Short-term thinking
What Tiger did was terrible and completely unacceptable. But assuming Tiger doesn’t forget how to play golf by the time he returns to the sport, I suspect that the massive Tiger Effect is unlikely to diminish any time soon.

You realize it’s only a matter of time before he does return to golf and does so with a seriousvengeance, right? You really think an athlete of his caliber is not going to come back with a big point to prove?

From Bill Clinton and John F. Kennedy to Charlie Sheen and Kobe Bryant, we’ve witnessed numerous individuals who’ve not seriously suffered the long-term reputational and commercial destruction that is broadly and immediately assumed to follow a scandal of this magnitude. For Pete’s sake, New England Patriots quarterback Tom Brady ran off with a supermodel as his ex-girlfriend announced that she was having his baby. No one even talks about that anymore.

Tiger could easily be even more popular in his return to golf than he was before he left it. True, nobody will ever think he’s some clean-cut, paragon of perfection again. But does that matter? As P.T. Barnum said, “Any publicity is good publicity.” And that is what is important — at least from a commercial standpoint.

The real losers
That’s why I seriously question the decisions of companies like General MotorsProcter & Gamble (NYSE: PG), PepsiCo (NYSE: PEP), and Accenture (NYSE: ACN) to drop (or heavily marginalize) Tiger as a sponsor of their products. After all, this situation is nothing that some time and a little humility can’t repair.

Unlike other contemporary professional athletes, Tiger hasn’t killed anyone. Tiger did not ruthlessly abuse helpless animals. As far as I know, he hasn’t pumped his muscles full of illegal substances either. Tiger just had a wandering eye. And that is something that plenty of people can relate to personally.

You didn’t see Nike (NYSE: NKE) running for the hills, did you? As far as athlete-related scandals go, this one is relatively tame. That was a smart decision, because Nike, along withElectronic Arts (Nasdaq: ERTS) and a few others, now have an under-valued asset nearly all to themselves. Those who’ve cut his services, however, have now just kicked a man when he’s down. That’s not something that can be easily undone.

What were they thinking?
Throughout all this, I can’t help but think three things about the management teams at companies that cut their ties with Tiger:

  1. They’re short-term, reactionary thinkers driven more by day-to-day public image concerns than long-term economic benefits.
  2. They’re neither flexible nor creative enough to adapt to and solve a PR problem related to something so common that it affects many millions of families across the nation.
  3. They believe the public has no capacity to forgive Tiger – ever.

Tiger play
Of course, Tiger’s face shouldn’t be plastered all over products in stores right now. He needs a lengthy time-out — just like all public figures do after a big controversy.

But come on — how many guys will stop buying razors or drinking Gatorade because their pitch-man attracted too many women? Many of these products are marketed precisely tohelp customers attract more women. Who do these folks think they’re selling to?

Michael Jordan, by way of example, certainly has his history of serious flaws. But none of them ever stopped McDonald’s (NYSE: MCD) or Coca-Cola (NYSE: KO) from fronting him. Even today, the Michael Jordan commercial engine continues strong.

With just even a smidgen of creativity, I could see Tiger’s corporate partners even capitalizing from this situation.  But they’re clearly not interested — and I think that is stupid, myopic, and borderline arrogant.

Where the value is
If Tiger were a stock, I’d buy him right now – not because he’s a great guy and not because I feel bad for him, but because he’s been oversold. He’s a discounted and valuable economic asset that has serious long-term potential.

As for the companies that just dropped him, I wonder why corporate managers bought Tiger high and sold him low. Why are they always reacting to yesterday’s news and failing to thinking about the future impacts of their decisions? It’s all very disappointing.

But that’s enough of my opinion. Tell us your opinion in the Motley Poll below.

VN:F [1.8.3_1051]
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)
VN:F [1.8.3_1051]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

2 comments

China Surpasses U.S. in 2009 Auto Sales

Listen with webreader

http://autos.yahoo.com/articles/autos_content_landing_pages/1240/china-surpasses-us-in-2009-auto-sales

By Joe McDonald, AP Business Writer
 Chinese car shoppers

Chinese car shoppers

BEIJING (AP) — China overtook the United States as the biggest auto market in 2009 and automakers should see more strong growth this year, an industry group reported Friday.

Boosted by Beijing’s stimulus, 2009 passenger car sales soared to 10.3 million and total vehicle sales are estimated at 13.6 million, the China Passenger Car Association said. That represents growth of about 45 percent from 2008.

“This is even better than anyone expected,” the group’s general secretary, Rao Da, said at a news conference in Shanghai.

By contrast, U.S. sales of cars and light trucks plunged 21 percent in 2009 to 10.4 million as a shaky economy kept buyers away from showrooms. It was the first time any country bought more cars than Americans.

The Chinese group’s data were in line with forecasts by J.D. Power and Associates of 12.7 million sales of cars and light trucks and 900,000 bigger vehicles in 2009 for a total of 13.6 million. The company in early 2009 expected sales of 9 million vehicles but raised that as Beijing rolled out measures to boost demand.

“It’s very, very strong growth, far beyond the expectations we had in the early part of 2009,” said John Bonnell, a J.D. Power analyst.

China’s status as the top auto market is yet another sign of its rapid rise as a global economic power. After a two-decade economic boom, it is believed to have passed Germany last year as the biggest exporter and is expected to overtake Japan soon as the second-largest economy after the United States.

Global automakers including General Motors Co., Ford Motor Co. and Germany’s Volkswagen AG looked to China to help drive revenues as demand elsewhere plunged and U.S. automakers laid off workers and shuttered factories. Volkswagen says China is its biggest market.

GM says 2009 sales by the company and its local partners in China rose 67 percent last year, while Ford says sales were up 44 percent.

China, with 1.3 billion people and a growing urban elite, was long expected to become the top auto market but not until as late as 2020. That date moved up as the U.S. crisis dragged down sales while China continued to grow with the help of a 4 trillion yuan ($586 billion) government stimulus.

Economic growth accelerated to 8.9 percent over a year earlier in the third quarter and the government says it should be 8.3 percent for the full year.

Beijing boosted purchases by slashing sales taxes on smaller, fuel-efficient cars and spending $730 million on subsidies for buyers of SUVs, pickup trucks and minivans. Stimulus spending on building highways and other public works also helped to boost sales of trucks used in construction.

China’s monthly purchases exceeded those of the United States for all but two months last year.

Rao said auto sales in 2010 could grow by another 20 percent so long as China’s economic recovery continues and oil prices stay stable. Bonnell said J.D. Power expects a lower but still healthy growth of 6 to 7 percent.

“The temptation is to say that with 45 percent growth in 2009 there must be a payback in 2010,” Bonnell said. “But all indications are the government wants to continue to stimulate things, and our expectation is they will succeed in doing that.”

Automakers are looking to first-time buyers in smaller Chinese cities to help drive sales as incomes outside the country’s prosperous east coast rise.

“People there are getting richer and can afford cars. Younger people can work for two or three years and with the help of their parents can buy a car,” Rao said. “Being able to afford a car in China is not so difficult any more. People with an average salary can afford to buy a car.”

China’s small but ambitious automakers are starting to expand abroad and some have set up factories in Ukraine, Iran and other developing markets. Some want to break into U.S. and Western European markets but have yet to satisfy safety and emissions standards.

“We don’t see that they are ready, that they are achieving these levels of quality or safety,” said Bonnell. “There is no indication that next step is right on the horizon.”

Associated Press researcher Ji Chen in Shanghai contributed to this report.

Copyright © 2007 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. The information contained in the AP News report may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed without the prior written authority of The Associated Press.
VN:F [1.8.3_1051]
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)
VN:F [1.8.3_1051]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

Add a comment

Churches attacked by cocktail fire bomb in Malaysia!!!

Listen with webreader

http://thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?file=/2010/1/8/nation/20100108115637&sec=nation

PM, other leaders condemn arson attacks (Update 8)

PUTRAJAYA: Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak has condemned the attacks made on three churches in the Klang Valley but has asked the public not to start pointing fingers at who may have been responsible for the attacks.

The Prime Minister said he viewed the matter seriously as these actions could jeopardise harmony, adding that the Government would take all possible action to prevent such incident from recurring.

At the same time, Najib had directed the Inspector-General of Police Tan Sri Musa Hassan to beef up security and surveillance at places of worship.

“We must not allow the peace and the understanding that we have among Malaysians of various ethnic backgrounds and faiths be threatened by anyone or any parties.

Datuk Seri Hishammuddin Tun Hussein and IGP Tan Sri Musa Hassan at a press conference at Bukit Aman on Friday.

“As I have said before, whatever problems that arise, we must use the right channel and method to solve it. Our action must not be against the law as this can jeapordise harmony,” he told reporters after chairing the fourth Northern Corridor Implementation Authority (NCIA) on Friday.

Also present were Deputy Prime Minister Tan Sri Muhyiddin Yassin and Chief Secterary to the Government Tan Sri Sidek Hassan.

Najib also reminded the public not to point fingers on who the perpetrators behind the church attacks were but should allow the authorities to conduct a thorough investigation into the matter.

“Action will be taken against those responsible based on facts and the law,” he said.

Asked if there were fears of retaliation due to the incident, the Prime Minister said the authorities must nip the problem in the bud.

“I hope with statements and action taken by the police, people will not take law into their hands. The IGP will report to me on the incident once there are evidence and new developments,” he added.

Umno Youth head Khairy Jamaluddin at the Tabernacle Church in Desa Melawati on Friday

Other public figures have come out to condemn the arson attacks against the two churches.

Urging all parties to remain calm, they also asked for swift police action to ensure the situation does not get out of control.

In the meantime, the MCA is offering the Metro Tabernacle Church the use of its hall at Wisma MCA for its services this Sunday, vice-president Datuk Seri Dr Ng Yen Yen said.

The MCA, through its religious bureaus, will find an immediate place for the Metro Tabernacle to relocate, she said.

“This is the act of a very small group of Malaysians. We need to come together and work against any form of violence.

MCA vice-president Datuk Seri Dr Ng Yen Yen at the Metro Tabernacle Church in Desa Melawati on Friday.

“Do not leave it to the Government or the police alone; the rakyat (people) must come together and stand up for each other,” she said.

MCA national youth chairman Datuk Dr Wee Ka Siong also condemned the attacks, saying the movement is saddened.

“Such despicable acts serve no purposes in bridging differences, and … will ultimately destroy initiatives to help shore up harmony between the various faiths in Malaysia.

“MCA Youth urges all decent minded Malaysians not to let the mercury rise further, and pray in our own ways, that peace will prevail,” he said in a statement.

Kedah Gerakan’s youth wing condemned the acts as despicable and shameful, and described the wrongdoers as cowards trying to cause disunity.

“Our country had came a long way since independence in promoting unity among Malaysians, despite the differences in race and religion.

“As such, all Malaysians should unite to condemn these cowardly attacks that threaten national unity,” said the wing’s chief Tan Keng Liang.

“As an act of good faith in condemning the arson attacks, I hope that the Government would consider assisting, including financially, the churches in repairing the damage caused by the despicable act of arson,” he added.

Gerakan central committee member Dr Hsu Dar Ren described the arson as “a wanton attack on the freedom of practice of religions which we should all treasure and protect in this multiracial society of ours.”

“I hope politicians on both sides of the divide will refrain from fanning emotions and instead try their best to cool the temperature down and let the judicial process run its course,” he said.

Opposition leader Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim described the attacks as heinous and said such actions were against the teachings of Islam.

“Islam teaches its followers to respect the places of worship of other religions. I urge all parties to remain calm. I have full faith that Malaysians will be able to resolve the matter without any conflict,” he said in a statement.

Selangor Mentri Besar Tan Sri Khalid Ibrahim, who was at the Assumption Church, condemned the attack, describing it as a cowardly act.

“I urge the police to give protection to all churches and conduct a thorough investigation on the attack on the Assumption Church,” he added.

Khalid also said that he was grateful to the church authorities, who had given their reassurance that they would not react to the arson attack.

“I appeal to the people in Selangor to refrain from any further such action, which will only cause further trouble for all people,” he added.

Umno Youth Chief Khairy Jamaluddin said it was a dark day for Malaysia.

“This is a despicable act. This is not the Malaysia I know,” said Khairy, who visited the Metro Tabernacle Church in Desa Melawait in Kuala Lumpur, which was attacked by arsonists early Friday.

He urged the police to act swiftly.

Saying that Barisan Nasional Youth strongly condemned the action, Khairy Jamaluddin added that whatever the feelings of anyone on the issue of the usage of the word “Allah” in the Herald, the irresponsible action of those who destroy places of worship should not be defended by Muslims.

“If Muslims are responsible for this incident, they should be ashamed and remorseful because clearly Islam advises Muslims to respect other religious beliefs.

“Malaysia is a multiracial country. There will be arguments and misunderstandings over issues which touch on race and religion.

“What is important is the people should resolve any problems with maturity and respect for each other’s sensitivity,” he said in a statement.

Selangor PAS termed the arson attacks as cowardly acts.

“We view the news of the attacks on churches, including in Selangor, with sadness and regret. Such attacks have never happened in our country and they do not at all reflect our culture, tradition or the religious beliefs of Malaysians.

“Selangor PAS sympathises with the affected churches and urges all PAS members in the state to remain calm and patient and pray for the safety of all,” its state Information chief Roslan Shahir Mohd Shahir said in a statement.

The Muslim Professionals Forum described this as “the cowardly and utterly senseless act of a group of misguided, chauvinistic bigots.”

“This act of arson, committed presumably in the name of Islam, desecrates the very religion it purports to protect. The Holy Quran unequivocally prohibits destroying the houses of worship of all religions, as warned in Surah Al-Hajj, Verse 40,” its board of directors said in a statement.

“During the reign of Umar ibn Al-Khattab, the second righteous caliph, the religious freedom of the citizens of Ilya (Jerusalem) and the sanctity of their synagogues and places of worship were confirmed, they said.

Muslim Professionals Forum urged the authorities to immediately conduct an impartial and thorough investigation to identify, apprehend and punish the perpetrators.

It also urge individuals, organisations and political parties to refrain from further issuing provocative and inflammatory statements related to the high court verdict.

“We also urge all Malaysians to empathise and stand in solidarity with our Christian community in their hour of grief and need, and urge all peace-loving Malaysians to maintain composure and let cool heads prevail,” they said in their statement.

Social activist Datin Paduka Marina Mahathir said it was very important for all Muslim Malaysians to condemn the act whole-heartedly.

“This is not what Islam is about. The leadership must play its role and come out and tell the people not to condemn houses of worship,” she told reporters at the church site.

Veteran DAP leader Lim Kit Siang said all political party leaders should take a common stand to condemn the attacks.

They should condemn “in the strongest possible terms the spate of church attacks in the wake of the ‘Allah’ controversy and ensure that there is no further escalation.

“As Prime Minister, Datuk Seri Najib Razak should immediately impress on the Home Minister Datuk Seri Hishammuddin Hussein to take all urgent and necessary measures to protect the good name of the country or be held responsible for any undesirable consequences,” he said.

Wangsa Maju Member of Parliament Wee Choo Keong said he was very shocked.

“The Prime Minister and Inspector-General of Police mus take immediate action to protect all places of worship regardless of their religion.

“We do not want to inflame the present tensions in the country or the country’s unity will be set back many years — this is a test for the Prime Minister and his 1Malaysia vision,” he said.

In Miri, Sarawak political leaders condemned the attacks as well, callling for the swift restoration of common sense and wisdom to prevent any escalation of violence.

Senior Iban state leader Datuk Peter Nyarok Entrie said his party, the Sarawak Progressive Democratic Party (SPDP), viewed the arson as an attack against the 1Malaysia concept and an attack against all peace-loving Malaysians.

“SPDP, a multiracial and multi-religious party that is made up of Muslims and non-Muslims, is shocked and saddened that the dispute over the use of the name ‘Allah’ in the peninsula had erupted into violence,” he said.

Nyarok, who is deputy president of SPDP, said there was a need to restore calm and order in the Klang Valley.

Parti Rakyat Sarawak (PRS) president and state Minister Datuk Seri Dr James Masing said the issue should not have been blown out of proportion.

“Politicians should stay out of this matter and leave it to the religious bodies of the respective religions to sit down and discuss a mutually acceptable way to resolve this,” he said.

Masing said Sarawak and Sabah do not have such controversies because people of all faiths and races were mature enough to accept each others’ beliefs.

Assistant state minister Datuk Daud Abdul Rahman, from the Parti Pesaka Bumiputra Bersatu, also stressed the need for common sense to prevail, saying that the state government has always practised tolerance and acceptance when it comes to handling issues of religious and racial nature.

Keadilan Sarawak chairman Baru Bian said the usage of Allah’s name became blown out of context in the peninsula because of political meddling.

He said this is a non-issue in Sarawak despite the name being used widely by all religions in the state for so many decades.


VN:F [1.8.3_1051]
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)
VN:F [1.8.3_1051]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

5 comments

« Older Entries